.
Feedback

Soccer Field Construction Riles Nearby H-Section Residents

Some say the new fields and lights, along with the noise factor, will threaten their quality of life.

Tree clearing and other aspects of construction have already begun to expand the Three Village Soccer Park at Stony Brook University, and negotiations are still ongoing between the Three Village Soccer Club and University officials regarding a new agreement on field use between the two neighbors.

However, caught in the middle is a separate group of neighbors: residents of the "H section" neighborhood, some of whom own property bordering the fields and are reeling at the thought of more soccer fields, lights illuminating some of those fields, and tree clearing that they say will kill their privacy, decrease their property values, and displace the wildlife.

"My concern is that the University is affecting our way of life. ... My wife and I are so upset that we are actually considering moving out of the community," said David Morgan, an H section resident since 2006. "We loved the neighborhood, the private setting, the woods. Now we have this issue."

"It’s not that we’re against Stony Brook," he added. "We actually moved to the community because we thought it was a great community. I feel like in the last year they’ve exploded and they’re taking over the community."

Vince and Cynthia Paretti, H section residents for 40 years, agreed and said they feel their neighborhood's interests have no representation within the negotiations over the soccer fields. They are concerned their property values will go down, and they worry there will be an increase in the noise generated by teams playing on the fields.

"It’s our life, it’s our investment. I don’t know what [the University's] endgame is," Vince Paretti said.

"They’ve changed the whole complexion of the neighborhood," Cynthia Paretti added.

They suggested that the University look toward space elsewhere on its campus for the fields they say are necessary for their recreational sports teams. "They have a lot of property. You drive by it and it seems like they have loads of space," Vince Paretti said.

However, other H section residents aren't as upset by the soccer field plans.

John Kitson, an H section resident since 1966, said that once he learned of the plan's specifics – including leaving a buffer of vegetation with a width of approximately 75 feet between the homes and the fields – he found it to be "a reasonable thing that serves both purposes," referring to both the community's needs and the University's needs.

"[The buffer] provides some privacy, though not as much as I had before," he said. "I also recognize the needs of the University. It was explained that the lighting wouldn’t affect me directly, that it would be on the other side of the fields more towards Stony Brook Road."

While University officials have previously said they circulated fliers in the neighborhood detailing the project, some residents, including Kitson, said they never received them. Thus, he said, his main concern was the lack of notification.

"I was never notified that this work was being done even though it’s bordering on my property," he said. "I thought the University would have been wise to be more sensitive to the community’s concerns."

Stony Brook spokeswoman Lauren Sheprow said University officials have already met with some residents of that neighborhood, and will continue to do so upon request.

When asked for comment, Sheprow said: "The University is working to balance the needs of the community and the needs of our students with regard to the sports fields improvement project next to the South P parking lot on the Stony Brook University Campus. ... Members of the community are encouraged to contact the Community Relations Office at 632-6302 with any questions or concerns about the sports fields improvement project."

Meanwhile, the negotiations are still ongoing. Soccer club president Mitch Pally told Patch on Jan. 2 the club is "awaiting a new draft permit from the University," which he said he expects to come this week.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Three Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Christine Sampson (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 06:35 pm
Hi C., please send me a note at christines@patch.com and I will answer your question.
Public Notice
Sycamore Senior May 19, 2013 at 12:38 pm
So, essentially that first residential home is being written off as the price of doing business.Read More There goes that property value. Other than as a professional residence, who would want to live by a driveway for that traffic? As for the entrance Village Automotive, that will bring even more traffic to an already busy intersection nearby. 25A is impassable/impossible in that area for large chunks of the day now.
K. B. May 19, 2013 at 08:16 am
The rezoning is for the acres of undeveloped residential land across from Ann Maries Farm stand,Read More extending down to the wooded area on 25A. A one way entrance would be placed by Village Automotive and a one way exit would come out on N. Country Rd. adjacent to the first residential house.
Public Notice
K. B. May 19, 2013 at 08:15 am
The rezoning is for the acres of undeveloped residential land across from Ann Maries Farm stand,Read More extending down to the wooded area on 25A. A one way entrance would be placed by Village Automotive and a one way exit would come out on N. Country Rd. adjacent to the first residential house.
jeanne austin May 19, 2013 at 07:01 am
Can you tell us where this property is? An address or street name?
justme May 19, 2013 at 05:45 pm
I the BOE and Union didn't allow the majority of the budget be spent on benefits and salaries maybeRead More there would be money left for supplies. With declining enrollment and cuts to programs for our kids they only ones making out are teachers and staff with too generous salaries and benefits. Vote no on Tuesday!
EG May 18, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Seriously? We are asked to send in enough supplies per kid each year to supply 5 kids. Where does itRead More all go? It gets lost, thrown out, or ends up back in the students home via backpack. The problem is not the lack of supplies, but a lack of personal responsibility. But if we send in enough supplies each year for ten or fifteen students, then we might be able to avoid the underlying problem.
Joe Monopoli May 16, 2013 at 09:53 am
Giveaways, Snacks, Refreshments, Activities for kids, and No cost to attend.
mneary May 16, 2013 at 08:49 pm
everyone should research what all the school administrators are raking in and the multple levels ofRead More staff that exists at TVCSD. It is beyond reasonable to have salaries at that level and multiple administrators and assistants and directors and assistant directors and chairman etc. Teachers earn their fair share!
Reality Check May 15, 2013 at 08:01 pm
Last year we lost 20 staff...this year we are losing over 50 meanwhile the remaining staff isRead More getting a 6% raise...the UNION is eating itself and ruining our school and the BOE is not dealing with the situation..the benefits are up nearly 13% this year...what do you think will happen next year? Another 60,70,80 to be laid off? My vote is NO!!!!
prof mom May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
I will be giving my "YES" vote next week.