.
Feedback

Three Village, Port Jeff Leaders Wary of Town's Proposed Next Gen Housing Code

Some area civic groups leery of proposed mixed-use development while others feel it's key to redeveloping downtown areas.

As residents and civic leaders from hamlets across Brookhaven voiced their concerns at a Town public hearing Tuesday that focused on the Next Generation Housing proposal put forth by Councilwoman Connie Kepert, a lot of the focus landed on the Three Village and Port Jefferson area.

According to Kepert, the idea would create a mixed-use residential zoning code that aims to encourage pedestrian-oriented development. Residential apartment units would be mixed among commercial retail space, with the code requiring a minimum of 1,000-square-feet of commercial space for every 10 residential units. Construction must also be in close proximity to transportation hubs or major roadways.

"This is something Long Island needs to move towards; a compact development not sprawling over our open spaces," she said. 

Kepert said the proposed Next Generation Housing zoning code would allow developers to build 12-14 units per acre of land, with higher density possible by using Pine Barrens credits. While the proposed code mandates a minimum of 20 percent of the residential units be affordable, she noted the idea is not designed to develop low-cost housing.

However, a number of speakers at the meeting expressed concerns that the new zoning category would lead to an increase in population density since the Next Generation Housing zoning would allow four-story residential buildings near Long Island Rail Road stations and major roadways.

"This far more resembles a license to spot zone throughout the Town than the ability to plan for a limited number of areas suitable for mixed-use, more dense housing to enhance walkable hamlet centers and downtowns around transportation hubs," said Robert de Zafra, a Setauket resident who spoke representing civic associations in Setauket and Stony Brook. 

Others said they have been fighting to prevent high-density housing from being constructed in their community.

"We in Terryville have fought a determined effort by several town politicians to build a high-density, low-income housing center in a downtown many of us have been working hard to resurrect," said Francis G. Gibbons Sr., executive board member of the Port Jeff Station/Terryville Civic Association. "New residential construction is a short-term solution to a long-term job problem." 

While some expressed concerns about Kepert’s proposal, there were some who also voiced their support.

Eric Alexander, executive director of Vision Long Island, said he was in favor of the Next Generation Housing idea as recent studies conducted by the non-profit organization show 43 percent of Suffolk residents would prefer to live in a walkable, downtown community. 

"We would envision this code would be applied where communities petition to have it," Alexander said. "Let's get another zoning option on the books." 

In addition, several residents from the Bellport area also spoke in support of the plan, saying that Next Generation Housing near the Bellport train station would be the "catalyst to change the entire area." 

"It's a step forward towards delivering what we envision as a vibrant main street, increased property values and promotes a sense of pride in the community," said John Rogers, acting chairman of the Greater Bellport Coalition. 

Given the level of public interest in the proposal, the Town Board will be accepting public comments until Feb. 1. The board may vote on the zoning code as early as its Feb. 5 meeting. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Three Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Christine Sampson (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 06:35 pm
Hi C., please send me a note at christines@patch.com and I will answer your question.
Public Notice
Sycamore Senior May 19, 2013 at 12:38 pm
So, essentially that first residential home is being written off as the price of doing business.Read More There goes that property value. Other than as a professional residence, who would want to live by a driveway for that traffic? As for the entrance Village Automotive, that will bring even more traffic to an already busy intersection nearby. 25A is impassable/impossible in that area for large chunks of the day now.
K. B. May 19, 2013 at 08:16 am
The rezoning is for the acres of undeveloped residential land across from Ann Maries Farm stand,Read More extending down to the wooded area on 25A. A one way entrance would be placed by Village Automotive and a one way exit would come out on N. Country Rd. adjacent to the first residential house.
Public Notice
K. B. May 19, 2013 at 08:15 am
The rezoning is for the acres of undeveloped residential land across from Ann Maries Farm stand,Read More extending down to the wooded area on 25A. A one way entrance would be placed by Village Automotive and a one way exit would come out on N. Country Rd. adjacent to the first residential house.
jeanne austin May 19, 2013 at 07:01 am
Can you tell us where this property is? An address or street name?
justme May 19, 2013 at 05:45 pm
I the BOE and Union didn't allow the majority of the budget be spent on benefits and salaries maybeRead More there would be money left for supplies. With declining enrollment and cuts to programs for our kids they only ones making out are teachers and staff with too generous salaries and benefits. Vote no on Tuesday!
EG May 18, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Seriously? We are asked to send in enough supplies per kid each year to supply 5 kids. Where does itRead More all go? It gets lost, thrown out, or ends up back in the students home via backpack. The problem is not the lack of supplies, but a lack of personal responsibility. But if we send in enough supplies each year for ten or fifteen students, then we might be able to avoid the underlying problem.
Joe Monopoli May 16, 2013 at 09:53 am
Giveaways, Snacks, Refreshments, Activities for kids, and No cost to attend.
mneary May 16, 2013 at 08:49 pm
everyone should research what all the school administrators are raking in and the multple levels ofRead More staff that exists at TVCSD. It is beyond reasonable to have salaries at that level and multiple administrators and assistants and directors and assistant directors and chairman etc. Teachers earn their fair share!
Reality Check May 15, 2013 at 08:01 pm
Last year we lost 20 staff...this year we are losing over 50 meanwhile the remaining staff isRead More getting a 6% raise...the UNION is eating itself and ruining our school and the BOE is not dealing with the situation..the benefits are up nearly 13% this year...what do you think will happen next year? Another 60,70,80 to be laid off? My vote is NO!!!!
prof mom May 15, 2013 at 10:05 am
I will be giving my "YES" vote next week.