.
Feedback

SBU Study: Fracking Presents High Water Pollution Risk

Study concludes that more regulation of hydraulic fracturing is necessary to prevent widespread water pollution problems.

Scientists at Stony Brook University have published a study that found a significant risk of water pollution could result from hydraulic fracturing, commonly called "fracking" or "hydrofracking," a process used to extract natural gas from the earth.

According to the authors of the study, Daniel Rozell, a Stony Brook doctoral student, and Sheldon Reaven, a professor in the Department of Technology and Society, more regulation shoud be enacted to prevent fracking wastewater from presenting the risk of contaminating drinking water.

Current wastewater treatment facilities "are not designed to handle hydraulic fracturing wastewater containing high concentrations of salts or radioactivity two or three orders of magnitude in excess of federal drinking water standards," Rozell and Reaven wrote in their study, which was published in the August edition of the journal Risk Analysis.

The process of hydrofracking entails the pumping of fluids into underground shale formations, which releases pockets of natural gas that are then pumped up to the surface.

Already along those lines, two Suffolk County legislators in February began that would prevent county wastewater treatment facilities from accepting hydrofracking wastewater.

The study focused on the approximately 124,000 square kilometers from New York to West Virginia known as the Marcellus Shale Region. According to the study, this region is in the process of being heavily developed.

The study examined water pollution pathways, such as a tanker truck spilling its contents, failure of well casings that could leak fluids to groundwater, spills at the drilling surface, and more.

"Future research efforts should be focused primarily on wastewater disposal and specifically on the efficacy of contaminant removal by industrial and municipal wastewater treatment facilities," the authors of the study concluded.

RELATED

  •  

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Three Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Christine Sampson (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 06:35 pm
Hi C., please send me a note at christines@patch.com and I will answer your question.
mary ann May 21, 2013 at 10:26 am
What a wonderful, thoughtful and giving thing to do for our soldiers!!! I applaud you all. You areRead More terrific!!! God bless.
Public Notice
Sycamore Senior May 19, 2013 at 12:38 pm
So, essentially that first residential home is being written off as the price of doing business.Read More There goes that property value. Other than as a professional residence, who would want to live by a driveway for that traffic? As for the entrance Village Automotive, that will bring even more traffic to an already busy intersection nearby. 25A is impassable/impossible in that area for large chunks of the day now.
K. B. May 19, 2013 at 08:16 am
The rezoning is for the acres of undeveloped residential land across from Ann Maries Farm stand,Read More extending down to the wooded area on 25A. A one way entrance would be placed by Village Automotive and a one way exit would come out on N. Country Rd. adjacent to the first residential house.
Public Notice
K. B. May 19, 2013 at 08:15 am
The rezoning is for the acres of undeveloped residential land across from Ann Maries Farm stand,Read More extending down to the wooded area on 25A. A one way entrance would be placed by Village Automotive and a one way exit would come out on N. Country Rd. adjacent to the first residential house.
jeanne austin May 19, 2013 at 07:01 am
Can you tell us where this property is? An address or street name?
justme May 19, 2013 at 05:45 pm
I the BOE and Union didn't allow the majority of the budget be spent on benefits and salaries maybeRead More there would be money left for supplies. With declining enrollment and cuts to programs for our kids they only ones making out are teachers and staff with too generous salaries and benefits. Vote no on Tuesday!
EG May 18, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Seriously? We are asked to send in enough supplies per kid each year to supply 5 kids. Where does itRead More all go? It gets lost, thrown out, or ends up back in the students home via backpack. The problem is not the lack of supplies, but a lack of personal responsibility. But if we send in enough supplies each year for ten or fifteen students, then we might be able to avoid the underlying problem.
Joe Monopoli May 16, 2013 at 09:53 am
Giveaways, Snacks, Refreshments, Activities for kids, and No cost to attend.
mneary May 16, 2013 at 08:49 pm
everyone should research what all the school administrators are raking in and the multple levels ofRead More staff that exists at TVCSD. It is beyond reasonable to have salaries at that level and multiple administrators and assistants and directors and assistant directors and chairman etc. Teachers earn their fair share!